| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1450
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 16:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Anabella Rella wrote:A smear campaign? For what purpose? If it was all just a fabrication then why did her own family disown and publicly chastise her? Also, I seem to recall that she later admitted that it was indeed her in the reels.
Indeed she did
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1450
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 18:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Morijah d'Hanguest wrote:In the Name of the Lord To whom it may concern, the original grounds that lead to the escalating of opinions and statements roughly one and a half years ago, have now been solved. While it is not my intent to further comment on the original grounds and the statements that followed, it shall be public knowledge that independent lawyersGÇöfrom both royal and imperial law firmsGÇöhave rendered expert opinions that all voiced statements and performed actions, regardless of their footing in actual events, are deemed null and void and Her Grace returned to the status quo ante. The public may account for that in its correspondence with the mentioned party. Yours sincerely, Morijah dGÇÖHanguest CEO of Ishtirak dGÇÖHanguest And what do your lawyers say about her recent heterodox comments? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1452
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 06:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:I'm quite in doubt whether those comments still count as 'heterodox', Admiral Blake. I'm usually quite in favour of being as inclusive as possible, but a line has to be drawn somewhere.
Also, CEO d'Hanguest, I suppose you have those expert opinions in writing? I'd like to have them checked by my own 'independent lawyers'. That said, I find the flux titles are subject to within the d'Hanguest family highly concerning, such decisions shouldn't be made as lightly as they appear to be made by you.
Regards, - N. Mithra
You're right of course, but then I always was one to favour inclusivity over ideology.
And I'm still interested to hear what the d'Hanguest lawers have to say about her comments - the lack of information would imply that they consider them to be not in keeping with a loyal Amarrian subject.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1456
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 17:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Morijah d'Hanguest wrote: 3.) The judges and arbiters of the Theology Council hold no jurisdiction over Royal Khanid nobility.
So for the record, are you saying that Odelya is a member of the Royal Khanid nobility?
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1458
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 17:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: So for the record, are you saying that Odelya is a member of the Royal Khanid nobility?
Huh? Have you lost your mind now? What my sister meant is Royal Khanid nobiliy, as opposed to Imperial nobilityGÇöbut doesn't this go without saying? What should a Duchess of Palas else be? Caldari nobility?
It's impossible for you to be a member of the Royal Khanid nobility and for you or your sister to suggest otherwise is arguably treason against your King.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1458
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 18:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Oh my, she appears to have almost broken the bank with this one...
Quote: Bounty placed on you From: CONCORD Sent: 2013.09.29 16:36
Odelya d'Hanguest placed 566,666 ISK in bounty on your head.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1459
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 18:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:Rodj Blake wrote:Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:Rodj Blake wrote: So for the record, are you saying that Odelya is a member of the Royal Khanid nobility?
Huh? Have you lost your mind now? What my sister meant is Royal Khanid nobiliy, as opposed to Imperial nobilityGÇöbut doesn't this go without saying? What should a Duchess of Palas else be? Caldari nobility? It's impossible for you to be a member of the Royal Khanid nobility and for you or your sister to suggest otherwise is arguably treason against your King. Royal is used to qualify the Khanid Kingdom. KhanidGÇöwithout the qualifierGÇömight be confused for a Khanid holder in the Empire. Since my dear sister is a lawyer herself she wouldn't make mistake.
That's funny, since I'm a lawyer by trade as well. The difference is that I'm right. Though we'll probably have to agree to disagree on that point.
Quote: It is known that you hardly leave your quarters, so why should I waste more than you are worth? Should you however have the guts I challenge you for a duelGÇöone versus one. My sister will work out the details.
The same for you, traitor scum.
As you are no doubt aware, the corp that I belong to has a ban on duels. And on top of that, I'm certainly not going to duel with a member of a supposedly allied corporation.
The one thing I don't understand is since you seem to hate everyone loyal to the Empire so much, why are you still in the militia? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1459
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 19:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:Rodj Blake wrote:As you are no doubt aware, the corp that I belong to has a ban on duels. And on top of that, I'm certainly not going to duel with a member of a supposedly allied corporation. I was aware that you are a sissy. But I wasnGÇÖt aware that you would even hide behind some stupid corp rules. And if you are certainly not going to exchange gun fire in form of an honourable duel with a member of an allied corporation, then why do you keep insulting this very member? I will fight for the Reclaiming until my last clone malfunctions, so who are you to ******* lecture me?
If you don't want me to insult you, then perhaps you should stop insulting not only the basis of my beliefs but everything that I stand for.
And I'll let you in on a little secret - I've gone easy on you so far out of respect for your corporation. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1469
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 11:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Morijah d'Hanguest wrote:In the Name of the Lord Ms Mithra, thank you for your explanations and comments. 1.) See 3.) 2.) The requirements to address Her Grace according to protocol and custom, are unrelated to her desires and wishes, or that of other parties. 3.) Although our lawyers point out that the juridical questions pertaining to the actual legal relationship between Kingdom and Empire are complex and remain largely unanswered, it is our legal opinion that since June 7th YC111 royal decrees are lodged at the Privy Council and the Imperial Chancellery, and are stored in their databases. The Privy Council holds authority over you, Ms Mithra, and His Majesty King Khanid II holds a seat under the name of GÇ£Lord Councillor Khanid of the Khanid KingdomGÇ¥. Royal decrees related to titles and holdings of the Kingdom are of full validity in the Empire. As you have found yourself by consulting the Book of Records in Dam Torsad, Her GraceGÇÖs titles were granted by royal decree and have been in our family for generations uncountable. Your personal stance in this matter is as relevant as you were to opine that an elephant is not an elephant. Yours sincerely, Morijah dGÇÖHanguest CEO of Ishtirak dGÇÖHanguest
And since the Theology Council also holds a seat on the Privy Council, I assume that you accept its authority on religious matters? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
| |
|